Understands and reproduces relevant arguments, debates and/or interpretations.Īcknowledges and employs techniques of academic writing with particular reference to structure, referencing/sourcing and spelling/grammar.ĭemonstrates some familiarity with the subject matter including, where appropriate, methodological, technical and scholarship issues. Presents an answer to the question taking into account appropriate structure, development of concepts/theories and reasonable use of evidence. Provides a good deployment of techniques of academic writing with particular reference to structure, referencing/sourcing and spelling/grammar.ĭemonstrates an understanding of core aspects of the subject matter including, where appropriate, methodological, technical and scholarship skills.
Understands and evaluates relevant arguments, debates and/or interpretations in a manner that demonstrates a capacity for independent thought. Presents a coherent and closely-argued answer with good structure, accurate use of concepts/theories, and good use of evidence. Provides a thorough and consistent deployment of techniques of academic writing with particular reference to structure, referencing/sourcing and spelling/grammar.ĭemonstrates good appreciation of the subject matter including, where appropriate, methodological, technical and scholarship skills. This may amount to an extension of existing arguments, debates and /or interpretations. Understands and evaluates relevant arguments, debates and/or interpretations in a manner that demonstrates a developed capacity for independent thought.
#DIPLOMA 6 ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FULL#
Presents a tightly-focused, relevant and well-structured answer with full and accurate development of concepts/theories, and excellent use of evidence. There is a range of marks for each of the classes and the marking criteria are provided in the table below: Class (Marks)ĭemonstrates command of the subject matter including, where appropriate, methodological, technical and scholarship skills. Performance is classified into five broad categories of: First Upper Second (2.1) Lower Second (2.2) Third Fail. You must pay particular attention to the paragraphs Referencing (3.1.7) and Plagiarism (3.1.8) and are strongly advised to read Regulation 11 in the University of Warwick Calendar. These rules and procedures relate to all undergraduate courses taught by the Department of Economics. However, for work during the year, you will also receive comments on it and this is part of the formative feedback that we provide. Any work that contributes towards the final module mark is known as summative assessment. You will experience a range of assessment methods, including mid-term tests, problem sets, presentations, essays and year-end exams during your Diploma. In particular, here you will find a link to the Department's Assessment Strategy. You can find details of all policies relating to Assessment and Feedback on the Department's Assessment and Feedback webpages. In this section of the Handbook, we will provide information about the assessment methods used throughout the Degree programme, as well as the various policies and procedures that are in place.
0 kommentar(er)
